🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced positive results. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."